| Project/Area Number |
16K01168
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Sociology/History of science and technology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Meiji University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
Sano Masahiro 明治大学, 経営学部, 専任教授 (70206001)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2016-04-01 – 2024-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2023)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2020: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Atomic power / Peaceful use / dual use / Nuclear Power / 原子力 / 原子力発電 / 原子力の平和的利用 / 原子力の社会的利用 / 技術論 / 原子力技術史 / 原子力発電所 / 原子力論 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
I have systematically and comprehensively collected publicly available digital data on the historical development of the arguments for and against the social use of nuclear energy and have undertaken the task of digitizing published materials to make them available for full-text search. Based on these efforts, I have provided a comprehensive introduction to the various materials and documents related to the arguments for and against the social use of nuclear energy throughout the 20th century in the journal "Gijutsusi"(History of Technology) published by The History of Science Society Japan, History of Technology Division. Additionally, I have published critical analyses of these debates and a guide to the materials on the website (https://sano-atom.bulog.jp/).
|
| Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
Digitizing nuclear power's social use materials enhances research, understanding, and collaboration. It promotes critical analysis of various factors, enriching academic discourse and informing policy-making, holding significant value for both academia and society.
|
