Project/Area Number |
16K03875
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Management
|
Research Institution | Osaka City University |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
松岡 久美 香川大学, 経済学部, 准教授 (30325310)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2016-04-01 – 2019-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2018)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,510,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥810,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
|
Keywords | 企業統治 / 社外取締役 / 取締役会 / 役割アイデンティティ / ガバナンス / 質的研究 / ガバナンス・コード / 経営戦略 / コーポレート・ガバナンス / 成長企業 / スチュワードシップ・コード / 役割認識 / 質的分析 / 成長戦略 / 出口戦略 / 外部取締役 / 利害関係 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
We investigate how outside directors define their director role under institutional change using the grounded theory approach. Based the semi-structured interviews with 70 directors and executives in Japanese firms, we are able to identify some important factors that shape the outside directors’ role identity. Our findings suggest that while role identity of outside directors is quite diverse because of the role ambiguity caused by institutional change, they try to make sense of competing institutional logics influenced by executives’ sensegiving on the director role and by external expectation created by the new governance regime leading them to choose different responses. In the institutional context where agency logic has not deeply penetrated, the formation of outside directors’ role identity is subject to influences from the interactions of multiple logics and the executives’ sensegiving which aims to shape the preferred definition of the role of outside directors.
|
Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
取締役の役割認識は内外の期待、および各自の専門的バックグラウンドや企業・取締役会の特徴により影響され形成されることが判明した.制度が大きく変化するときには、既存のルールと新しいルールの間にしばしばギャップや対立を生じさせ、それが役割に何が求められているかを現場レベルで曖昧にする傾向があることもわかった.
|