A Study of Methods of Judicial Review against Agency Interpretation of Statutes
| Project/Area Number |
16K16992
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Public law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kindai University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2016-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Chevron法理 / 制定法解釈 / 敬譲型審査 / 裁量 / 行政機関 / Chevron判決 / 行政機関による制定法解釈 / 敬譲型司法審査 / 立法規則 / 解釈規則 / 公法学 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This study mainly treats the Chevron deference which was indicated by the Supreme Court in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and analyzes the method of judicial review against agency interpretation of statutes in U.S. and Japan.
In particular, this study clarifies how courts had reviewed agency interpretations before 1984 in U.S., and analyzes the nature and rationale of the Chevron deference, the appearance of agency interpretations in Japan (especially focusing on difference of medium in which agencies show their interpretation), and the judicial review attitude against agency interpretation.
|
Report
(3 results)
Research Products
(3 results)
