Project/Area Number |
17K03911
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Management
|
Research Institution | Kindai University |
Principal Investigator |
Togo Hiroshi 近畿大学, 経営学部, 准教授 (10469249)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
金川 幸司 静岡県立大学, 経営情報学部, 教授 (00341470)
吉田 忠彦 近畿大学, 経営学部, 教授 (20210700)
團 泰雄 近畿大学, 経営学部, 教授 (60298502)
井上 祐輔 函館大学, 商学部, 准教授 (90737975)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2017-04-01 – 2020-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥4,420,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,020,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
|
Keywords | 協働優位性 / 公民協働 / 制度のロジック / 公民組織間コラボレーション / 新制度派組織論 / 組織間関係論 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This study shows the conditions for effective implementation of Public Private Collaboration (PPC) that can bring about “collaborative advantage”. First, it is necessary for each organization to adjust its own “institutional logic” so that it can pursue the goals of own organization and those of PPC at the same time. Through such adjustment of the "institutional logic", "collaborative advantage" that enables the creation of public and social values is created. Second, in response to the redefinition of the PPC by the administrative side in accordance with a change in the policy environment, it is necessary for each NPO to redefine own business missions for prevention of its deviation from the new meaning attached to the PPC assuming that the organizational capacity of each NPO is to be leveraged.
|
Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
研究成果の学術的意義や社会的意義は次の通りである。第一に、行為主体の実践を捉える制度論的分析を、セクターを超えた組織間関係たるPPC にまで敷衍させるとともに、PPC の実施過程を動態的にとらえる枠組みを提示したこと。第二に、PPC の実施に携わる実務家との反省的対話に基づいて、長期的視点から「協働優位性」の確立を前提としたPPC 実施条件を提示したこと。最後に、公共政策にかかわる実務家がそれぞれの立場から、実施運営の見直しや改善を行ううえでの指針を提供した点があげられる。
|