| Project/Area Number |
19320047
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
ヨーロッパ語系文学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Aoyama Gakuin University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
TOMIYAMA Takao Aoyama Gakuin University, 文学部, 教授 (70011377)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KAWATSU Masae 名古屋経済大学, 法学部, 教授 (30278387)
OISHI Kazuyoshi 名古屋大学, 文学研究科, 准教授 (50348380)
UMEGAKI Chihiro 青山学院女子短期大学, 英文学科, 准教授 (40413059)
YOSHINO Yuri 一橋大学, 法学部, 講師 (70377050)
YAMAGUCHI Midori 大東文化大学, 法学部, 准教授 (00384694)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
TAKAHASHI Kazuhisa 東京大学, 文学部, 教授 (10108102)
KAWASHIMA Akio 京都大学, 総合人間学部, 教授 (00128779)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2007 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥19,760,000 (Direct Cost: ¥15,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥4,560,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥7,020,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,620,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥5,980,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,380,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥6,760,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,560,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 女性 / 近代イギリス / 公共圏 / ジェンダー / セクシャリティ / 言説 / セクシャリティー |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The demarcation of private and public spheres became increasingly difficult in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, when social mobility increased rapidly along with the expansion of the British maritime powers overseas and the growth of consumerism at home. Women were not entirely confined to the 'private', 'domestic' sphere alone. According to her class and individual circumstances, each woman moves out of a private sphere into a public one. And her public spheres existed in multi-layered forms. Discourses by women writers during the period reflect their consciousness of multi-layered public spheres. Mary Wollstonecraft, Charlotte Smith, Hannah More, Jane Austen, Frances Burney, Mary Hays, Anna Laetitia Barbauld, and Maria Edgeworth, all envisaged variegated lines drawn to divide private from public spheres, in various regions of life, such as politics, consumption, religion, communication, and community. As a whole, domestic ideology grew increasingly powerful towards the early nineteenth century, as Evangelicalism gathered its momentum of influence over national life, but it did not preclude women from multiplying their public spheres and being active in them, as we see them in their writings.
|
