| Project/Area Number |
19320138
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Cultural anthropology/Folklore
|
|---|
| Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
HONDA Hiroshi The University of Tokyo, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 准教授 (50262093)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
伊藤 亜人 琉球大学, 法文学部, 教授 (50012464)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
ITO Abito 早稲田大学, アジア研究機構, 教授 (50012464)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
KIM Yangsook
HAMADA Mio
MIYAHARA Yoko いずれも東京大学, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 博士課程
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2007 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥9,620,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,220,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥2,210,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥510,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥2,210,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥510,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥2,730,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥630,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥2,470,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥570,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 産業化 / 韓国 / 長期持続 / 移動 / 農民社会 / 中産層 / 歴史人類学 / 産業集積 / 持続 / 都市新中間層 / 社会人類学 / 生活実践 / 開発 / 共同体 / 帰農 / 資源 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Firstly, we have constructed a frame of historical anthropology to analyze socio-economic changes of Korean rural society in the process of industrialization as an outcome of peasants'complex strategies of subsistence faced with over-population as well as urbanization. One of the sources of these strategies is modern experiences of migration, while there lies in the base the long duration of Korean peasants'strategy of migration and subsistence since after the late Choson period. Secondly, we have presented the perspective in which, by applying this frame to ethnographies of post-industrialized South Korea, cases of petit manufactures which lack local accumulation of resources, farming entrepreneurs, redevelopment of rural and agricultural villages, urban ways of life as well as their alternatives and rural religious practices would be interpreted as positive and flexible practices of life or economic activities based on the durability reconstructed in the industrialization.
|
