Study on the principle of burden of proof and on evidence law before the International Court of Justice
Project/Area Number |
19530041
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
International law
|
Research Institution | Toin University of Yokohama |
Principal Investigator |
UCHIGASAKI Yoshihide Toin University of Yokohama, 法学部, 教授 (70257426)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2007 – 2009
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2009)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,510,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥810,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
Keywords | 国際司法裁判所 / 証明責任 / 証拠法 / ICJ / ジェノサイド事件 / コンゴ事件 / ICJ訴訟法 / ICJ訴拠法 / 国連法 / 国際裁判 / 法発見 / 証拠の偏在 / 旧ユーゴ国際刑事裁判所 / 証明基準 / ポーター委員会 / フランス証拠法 / 書証主義 / 職権主義 |
Research Abstract |
Evidence procedure before the International Court of Justice has not yet been developed as a branch of international law. Judges and academic researchers are apt to apply their national jurisprudence. Continental and Anglo-American legal systems have greatly different views on a court, so they are out of accord on evidence rules. Therefore, it cannot provide an adequate theory to the international society to make just a comparative study among theories on the principle of the burden of proof of national laws. We need a consciously legislative action as international law. And in doing so, it can be said that characteristic of ICJ as a court of the international society needs unique measures which are not seen in national laws.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(4 results)