Supporting system for teacher to evaluate mathematical statements in learning community
| Project/Area Number |
20500840
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Educational technology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hiroshima City University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KAWAMOTO Kayo Hiroshima City University, 情報科学研究科, 助教 (10264938)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 教育工学 / 科学教育 / 解析・評価 / 情報システム |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
There are a number of automated rating applications for student essays. However, if we are going to rate mathematical statements, there is no rating application available at the moment. This study shows what statements are highly rated by mathematics experts, what characteristics such statements have, and what can be used as the points and standards of objective rating: one can rate a statement by looking at the numbers of conjunctions, logical steps or whether or not there is any algorithm included in the statements. By using these rating points, we have built an evaluation system with which teachers evaluate logical statements. And the rating points implemented, and tested with other mathematical statements to prove that the rating points and standards are valid.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(12 results)
