| Project/Area Number |
21730452
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Research Field |
Social welfare and social work studies
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Saitama Prefectural University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KATADA Kaori 埼玉県立大学, 保健医療福祉学部, 助教 (40523999)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2009 – 2011
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2011)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥520,000 (Direct Cost: ¥400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥120,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | ベーシックインカム / ジェンダー / 脱商品化 / 脱家族化 / フェミニズム |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
In this article, I argue about the intersection of Basic Income and Feminism which are criticisms towards Welfare State. We can say that the center of the claim of Basic income is in De-commodification and the center of the claim of Feminism is in De-familialization. However, especially in the case of women, the relationship between De-commodification and De-familialization is often described as antinomy.
In order to consider the implication of Basic Income for women, I applied the Feminist Citizenship Theory.
The Outcome of consideration is that the past 3 Feminist Citizenship Models cannot achieve De-commodification and De-familialization at the same time. In comparison with this, the Basic Income Citizenship Model can dissolve this antinomy and achieve both at the same time. This work can be a help for figuring a new Feminist Social Policy.
|
