| Project/Area Number |
22241058
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Area studies
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kyoto University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KONO Yasuyuki 京都大学, 東南アジア研究所, 教授 (80183804)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TANAKA Koji 京都大学, 地域研究統合情報センター, 名誉教授 (10026619)
KOBAYASHI Satoru 京都大学, 東南アジア研究所, 准教授 (20452287)
YOKOYAMA Satoshi 名古屋大学, 環境学研究科, 教授 (30363518)
ISHIKAWA Satoshi 総合地球環境学研究所, 研究部, 准教授 (40433908)
YAMAO Masahiro 広島大学, 生物圏科学研究科, 教授 (70201829)
梅崎 昌裕 東京大学, 医学研究科, 准教授 (30292725)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
HOSHIKAWA Keisuke 京都大学, 地域研究統合情報センター, 助教 (20414039)
UMEZAKI Masahiro 東京大学大学院, 医学研究科, 准教授 (30292725)
TAKAGI Akira 総合地球環境学研究所, 研究部, 特任准教授 (70635151)
WATANABE Kazuo 総合地球環境学研究所, 研究部, 研究員 (30533012)
WATANABE Kazuya 山形大学, 農学部, 准教授 (80406892)
HORI Mina 高知大学, 教育研究部総合科学系, 助教 (60582476)
HOMMA Koki 京都大学大学院, 農学研究科, 講師 (60397560)
TOMITA Shinsuke ペンシルベニア州立大学, 研究員 (60378966)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2010-04-01 – 2014-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥46,670,000 (Direct Cost: ¥35,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥10,770,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥7,280,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,680,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥11,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥9,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,700,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥13,520,000 (Direct Cost: ¥10,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥3,120,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥14,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥10,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥3,270,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 東南アジア / 生業転換 / 生存基盤 / 農山漁村 / 生態資源利用 / 土地利用 / 人口構造 / 家族形態 / 持続型生存基盤 / カンボジア / 生態資源 / ラオス / タイ |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This study focused on changes in livelihood of rural Southeast Asia during the last several decades and tried to identify sustainable humanosphere there. The case studies were carried out at the mountainous and lowland areas in Southeast Asia. The major conclusions are 1) rural livelihood in Southeast Asia are affected by both rapidly-changing governance and market and comparatively stable social and family networks; 2) the major driver of change is the connection between rural livelihood and global governance and market; 3) the major strategy of rural people to establish sustainable humanosphere is livelihood diversification at the household and community levels; 4) people confront higher risks when they simplify livelihood and/or change the whole set of livelihood. These suggest that identifying the structure of livelihood and examining possibility and risks accompanied by livelihood transition are the major research agenda of sustainable humanosphere studies at the regional level.
|
