| Project/Area Number |
22243007
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Civil law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Nagoya University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
CHIBA Emiko 名古屋大学, 法学(政治学)研究科(研究院), 教授 (70113587)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
HAYASHI Shuya 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (30364037)
SAKAI Hajime 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (70248095)
MARUYAMA Emiko 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (80250661)
SUZUKI Masabumi 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (90345835)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
HASEBE Yukiko 学習院大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (40159637)
HARADA Hiroki 京都大学, 法学研究科, 准教授 (90404029)
OKAMOTO Hiroki 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (90372523)
SUMIDA Mihoko 一橋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (10316903)
OHSAWA Aya 法政大学, 法学部, 准教授 (30510995)
YOKOMIZO Dai 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (00293332)
TAKAHASHI Yusuke 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (50304291)
HIENUKI Toshifumi 北海学園大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (70113610)
SAKUMA Osamu 大阪大学/一橋大学, 高等司法研究科/法学研究科, 教授/教授 (00126864)
MIYAKI Yasuhiro 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 准教授 (50453858)
YOSHIMASA Tomohiro 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 准教授 (70378511)
TAKAHASHI Yoshiyuki 筑波大学, システム情報系, 准教授 (10720683)
MACHIMURA Yasutaka 北海道大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (60199726)
WATANABE Miyuki 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (40271853)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2010-04-01 – 2014-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥32,370,000 (Direct Cost: ¥24,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥7,470,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥5,720,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,320,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥7,670,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,770,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥9,230,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,130,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥9,750,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,250,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 集団的消費者利益 / 消費者団体訴訟制度 / 消費者法 / 競争法 / 経済的不利益賦課制度 / 適格消費者団体 / 課徴金制度 / 公法・私法協働論 / 民事法学 / 公私協働論 / 集合訴訟制度 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This project tackled with the appropriate mechanisms to resolve disputes and obtain redress for consumers'interests harmed by business entities, when the harmed interest of each onsumer was too fragmented and small for he/she to take action individually, but the accumulated harm was large and important enough for the society to take some measures. Interdisciplinary groups of legal scholars in the wide fields of substantive law as well as those in procedural law participated in the project.
The results of the project may be summarized as follows. First, within the collective interests of consumers, three categories could be identified:i.e.,"combined interests","diffused interests" and "social interests". Second, appropriate measures were discussed in accordance with the types of the interests at issue, taking into account that each type differs in the extent to which the interests of consumers as an individual on one hand, and those of the public on the other, should be protected.
|
