Policy Formation Process and Pragmatic Approach to IntellectualProperty Law and Policy
| Project/Area Number |
22330036
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
New fields of law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hokkaido University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
SUZUKI Masabumi 名古屋大学, 大学院・法学研究科, 教授 (90345835)
NAKAYAMA Ichiro 國學院大學, 法科大学院, 教授 (10402140)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2010 – 2012
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2012)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥6,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥2,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥600,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 知的財産法 / 特許法 / 著作権法 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
There are two possible ways of using "intellectual property" as metaphor. The first approach sees intellectual property law as the way of providing protection to "intellectual works", and the second one understands intellectual property law as the ways of "regulating human activities". We argue the latter approach is recommendable. If this approach is adopted, those who argue for strengthening intellectual property protection will have to provide a more persuasive argument, which will support such protection and which will lead to its internalization by the regulated entities. The selection of metaphor thus significantly affects the overall process of conducting "muddling through" during the designing an intellectual property regime.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(182 results)
