Inter-war International Relations and the Limitation of Nationalism
| Project/Area Number |
23730176
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
International relations
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Nagoya University of Commerce & Business |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥130,000 (Direct Cost: ¥100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥30,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥390,000 (Direct Cost: ¥300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥90,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | ナショナリズム / 戦間期 / 国際関係論 / イギリス / 国際関係学 / 国際関係研究 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This research explores how the theories and concepts of Nationalism were incorporated into the newly-introduced study of International Relations (IR) in Britain, arguing that the scholars' theoretical attempt to limit the hostility of nationalism eventually surrendered to the empirical reality of international politics during the inter-war period. The focus is placed on a discussion and report made by a research group at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, also known as Chatham House, whose official aim was to provide a "scientific examination" of contemporary developments of nationalism that had dominated Europe since the end of the nineteenth century and believed to "threaten the very future of civilization".
The research outcome would defend a historically sensitive approach to the labelling of international theories, avoiding the reductionism of a broader political and social debate to an ahistorical realism- utopianism dichotomy of the First Great Debate.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(12 results)
