Theory of Argumentation Semantics based on the Balance Theory and its Practice on Pervasive Personal Tools
| Project/Area Number |
24500166
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Intelligent informatics
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Niigata University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2012-04-01 – 2015-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2014)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥5,330,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,230,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | ハイダーの均衡理論 / 数理議論学 / 抽象議論フレームワーク / 議論意味論 / 社会心理学 / PIRIKA |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Argumentation is a computing mechanism internalizing both inference and communication from scratch. It is a fundamental mechanism for realizing social intelligence on a computer. So far, Dung’s abstract argumentation framework (AF) and its argumentation semantics have been considered as a most promising approach to computational argumentation. Many people have contributed many results towards its improvement, extension, reinterpretation and so on. We, however, observed some defects and weakness of his approach in the point that it only deals with a limited aspect of argumentation. That is, he presented a notion of argument acceptability based on argument attack only. Another important notion, argument support, is missing in his framework. In this work, we take an innovative approach to overcome this defect, which is inspired by the socio-psychological balance theory. We theorize a new argumentation semantics named the balanced semantics for argumentation, and its implementation.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(18 results)
