A Theoritical examine about resposibility on Fairness Opinion issuer.
| Project/Area Number |
25780065
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Civil law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kanazawa University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
NAGAE Wataru 金沢大学, 法学系, 准教授 (20610786)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2013-04-01 – 2016-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2015)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,030,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥930,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2014: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 企業買収 / M&A / 投資銀行 / 買収価格 / 信認義務 / 専門家責任 / 会社法 / 組織再編 / 民事法学 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Most of managers are retained some advice such like Fairness Opinion from investmentbankers due to their shortage of knowledge in M&A context. Neverthelss investmentbankers sometimes shows inppropriate Opinion due to thier insentives such like their rewards or gain from staple finance. This study targets how to recover their loss. To study this theme, Author studies U.S. case laws and argument of academics.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(7 results)
