個人の大衆性が弁証法的議論に及ぼす影響に関する実験検討

DOI HANDLE オープンアクセス

抄録

This study was aimed to examine the impacts of vulgarity of the masses, the concept discussed by Ortega, on dialectic discussion. We predicted that dialectic discussion tends not to be conducted when the mass man takes part in the discussion. To test this hypothesis, we implemented an experiment that targeted university students. Participants were asked to respond to questionnaires proposed in the previous study for measuring the vulgarity of the masses on the basis of Ortega’s theory. They were then asked to take part in discussion over a social issue by pairwise coupling. The result suggested that the masses tend not to discuss with the opponent cooperatively and are more likely to switch focuses of argument in presence of opponent’s opposite opinion. Furthermore, it was found that the masses tend not to change their attitude through discussion. The results revealed evidence in support of the present hypothesis that dialectic discussion would be prevented by the presence of the masses.

収録刊行物

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

詳細情報

  • CRID
    1390853649686857344
  • NII論文ID
    120005666197
  • DOI
    10.14989/200774
  • HANDLE
    2433/200774
  • ISSN
    18834329
  • 本文言語コード
    ja
  • データソース種別
    • JaLC
    • IRDB
    • CiNii Articles
    • KAKEN
  • 抄録ライセンスフラグ
    使用可

問題の指摘

ページトップへ