研究課題/領域番号 |
21K00786
|
研究種目 |
基盤研究(C)
|
配分区分 | 基金 |
応募区分 | 一般 |
審査区分 |
小区分02100:外国語教育関連
|
研究機関 | 大阪大学 |
研究代表者 |
リー シーチェン・ナンシー 大阪大学, 大学院人文学研究科(言語文化学専攻), 准教授 (60512308)
|
研究分担者 |
小川 知恵 京都産業大学, 文化学部, 准教授 (40645107)
|
研究期間 (年度) |
2021-04-01 – 2025-03-31
|
研究課題ステータス |
交付 (2023年度)
|
配分額 *注記 |
3,510千円 (直接経費: 2,700千円、間接経費: 810千円)
2023年度: 1,560千円 (直接経費: 1,200千円、間接経費: 360千円)
2022年度: 1,430千円 (直接経費: 1,100千円、間接経費: 330千円)
2021年度: 520千円 (直接経費: 400千円、間接経費: 120千円)
|
キーワード | Speaking assessment / communicative adequacy / rater evaluation rubrics / speaking development / speaking proficiency / speaking evaluation / evaluation / rater evaluation / validation / speaking assessment / CAF |
研究開始時の研究の概要 |
Developing English speaking proficiency is a continuous challenge for learners and teachers. Not only do learners struggle, many teachers also struggle with evaluatig English speaking. This research aims to develop and validate the measurement of speaking communicative adequacy for EFL learners.
|
研究実績の概要 |
Speaking evaluation is an ongoing challenge for many classroom practitioners. How to more effectively assess speaking proficiency of language is therefore an ongoing multifacted development. Speaking measurement remains controversial because it varies depending on the objectives of the speakers and the contexts in which they are in (Housen & Kuiken, 2009; Norris & Ortega, 2009). Researchers in the past three decades often measured second language (L2) speaking proficiency in terms of three constructs: complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) (Ellis & Barkhuizen, 2005; Norris & Ortega, 2009). While communicative adequacy is argued to be another measurement of speaking proficiency because it evaluates the degree to which speakers are successful in achieving the objective of their speaking task (Pallotti, 2009). However, similar to the previous CAF triad, the measurement of communicative adequacy is not without criticisms because the evaluation criteria for assessing the overall speaking performance of learners and the contribution of each criteria towards the overall evaluation remain controversial. This project aims to conceptualize EFL communicative adequacy and to develop rater evaluation rubrics for measuring the speaking performance of Japanese university students.
|
現在までの達成度 (区分) |
現在までの達成度 (区分)
4: 遅れている
理由
一年間育休をしていたためです。
|
今後の研究の推進方策 |
Research meetings will be conducted monthly to speed up the research progress. One domestic conference presentation has been schedule for October 2024. Proposal has been submitted to an international conference in April 2025.
|