研究課題/領域番号 |
22K00814
|
研究種目 |
基盤研究(C)
|
配分区分 | 基金 |
応募区分 | 一般 |
審査区分 |
小区分02100:外国語教育関連
|
研究機関 | 広島大学 |
研究代表者 |
CLENTON JONATHAN 広島大学, 人間社会科学研究科(総), 准教授 (80762434)
|
研究分担者 |
Fraser Simon 広島大学, 外国語教育研究センター, 教授 (10403510)
内原 卓海 東北大学, 国際文化研究科, 講師 (10905847)
|
研究期間 (年度) |
2022-04-01 – 2025-03-31
|
研究課題ステータス |
交付 (2023年度)
|
配分額 *注記 |
3,640千円 (直接経費: 2,800千円、間接経費: 840千円)
2024年度: 260千円 (直接経費: 200千円、間接経費: 60千円)
2023年度: 2,210千円 (直接経費: 1,700千円、間接経費: 510千円)
2022年度: 1,170千円 (直接経費: 900千円、間接経費: 270千円)
|
キーワード | flemma / lemma / word family / lexical choices / lexical diversity / fluency / vocabulary / speach / speaking / knowledge / bilingual / tasks |
研究開始時の研究の概要 |
The plan is to conduct studies across 5 different proficiencies towards the purpose of the larger-scale proposed project: current data suggests that relationships between the three different IELTS speaking task prompts and productive vocabulary knowledge change according to proficiency levels.
|
研究実績の概要 |
Completed data collection and analysis of 150 participants, at three different proficiency levels. Presented these preliminary findings at the prestigious vocab@vic conference (Wellinton, December 2023). Research relates to choice of different word counts necessary to predict proficiency in relation to lexical choices (lexical diversity measurements). Research findings appear to indicate that fluency mitigates vocabulary choices, although not as expected. The higher the proficiency might not always indicate specific word choice, but indicates that choices are consistently made at specific proficiencies.
|
現在までの達成度 (区分) |
現在までの達成度 (区分)
2: おおむね順調に進展している
理由
Currently, awaiting research assistant data analysis, which pertains to flemma, lemma, word count measure analysis. Once completed, we aim to examine how these different word counts relate to different units of analysis.
|
今後の研究の推進方策 |
As we are awaiting research assistant data analysis, which pertains to flemma, lemma, word count measure analysis, we cannot complete our first data analysis and presentation. However, once completed, we aim to examine how these different word counts relate to different units of analysis and to work towards publication. This first set of data is currently being analysed and will need to be paid for. Following this initial round of analysis, we then aim to consider additional analyses which allude to bi/ trigram delineation and the extent to which these relate to word count measures. These further analyses will also require RA payment and processing, to then support paper writing and publication.
|