研究課題/領域番号 |
22K17948
|
研究種目 |
若手研究
|
配分区分 | 基金 |
審査区分 |
小区分61030:知能情報学関連
|
研究機関 | 京都大学 |
研究代表者 |
SAHAB Sofia 京都大学, 情報学研究科, 特定助教 (00892928)
|
研究期間 (年度) |
2022-04-01 – 2025-03-31
|
研究課題ステータス |
交付 (2022年度)
|
配分額 *注記 |
4,550千円 (直接経費: 3,500千円、間接経費: 1,050千円)
2024年度: 1,690千円 (直接経費: 1,300千円、間接経費: 390千円)
2023年度: 1,430千円 (直接経費: 1,100千円、間接経費: 330千円)
2022年度: 1,430千円 (直接経費: 1,100千円、間接経費: 330千円)
|
キーワード | AI agent policy / Conversational agent / Online discussion / IBIS framework / consensus policy / conversational agent / online discussion / agent facilitation / cyber democracy |
研究開始時の研究の概要 |
In this project, facilitation consensus policy subclass is constructed for agent to lead discussion. Three aspects are included: consensus policy during first phase of discussion for social issue prioritization; consensus policy after need assessment for issue-solving; and consensus policy for pros of idea and cons of idea. Based on this method, proactive agent will characterize conversational agent to start from raising issue-prioritization, move with issue-solving mediation, and ends with argument over identified ideas pros and cons deliberation.
|
研究実績の概要 |
In order to support diverse facilitation, I aimed to develop a discussion element-specific facilitation policy based on the Issue-Based Information System (IBIS). In the first term of research, I conducted literature studies on facilitation policy and proposed element-specific facilitation policy. In the second term, two types of element-specific facilitation policy proposed and completed the policy configurations of agents. The first proposed policy defines the agent behavior to interact with the author of proposed ideated solutions using predefined threshold while targeting proposed solutions. The proposed policy aims to question proposed ideated solution in order to raise the possibility of problems and challenges that lie within the ideated solution to form a diverse consensus. The second configured policy adopts idea-seeking policy using predefined threshold while targeting posted issues and challenges in order to promote ideated solutions for the posted issues and challenges. In order to evaluate the proposed approach, a set of experiments has been conducted. The experimental results with first policy showed that the agent had capable to stimulate discussion elements in line with proposed policy objectives. The results have been submitted to international conferences for publication.
|
現在までの達成度 (区分) |
現在までの達成度 (区分)
2: おおむね順調に進展している
理由
I have proposed and configured the discussion element-specific facilitation policy on conversational agents using the IBIS system, as a suitable format for critically facilitating problem-solving conversation. In order to evaluate the first proposed policy, conducted social experiment in real-world. The agent’s performance was submitted to two international conferences and I have prepared to submit it in an academic journal. Furthermore, I also start preparing to conduct a set of experiments to evaluate the second proposed policy efficiency. The works are going as well as I expected.
|
今後の研究の推進方策 |
I plan to conduct a set of experiments to evaluate the second proposed policy efficiency. Additionally, in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed facilitation policies with existing policy, some cross-country social and controlled experiment will be required to explore the generalizability and applicability of the research findings in different cultural or contextual settings, and based on the experiment’s results, I can adjust design parameters of the conversational agent facilitation policies. The agent’s performance will be further analyzed and summarized to submit in an international conference or journal.
|