2002 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
Competitive Region and Its Management : An Investigation of 'Collaborative Management'
| Project/Area Number |
12791006
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for University and Society Collaboration
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Research Field |
Business administration
|
|---|
| Research Institution | AICHIGAKUIN UNIVERSITY |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
FUTAGAMI Kyoichi Aichigakuin University, Management, Professor, 経営学部, 教授 (10063512)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SHIMAMOTO Minoru Management, Associate Professor, 経営学部, 助教授 (20319180)
SHIBA Takashi Management, Professor, 経営学部, 教授 (70308758)
MATSUBARA Toshihiro Management, Professor, 経営学部, 教授 (10075856)
TSUDA Hidekazu Management, Associate Professor, 経営学部, 助教授 (80329599)
UKAI Hironari Management, Associate Professor, 経営学部, 助教授 (70329598)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2000 – 2002
|
| Keywords | Regional Alliance / Regional Competitive Advantage / Industrial Cluster / Techno police / Research core / National College of Technology / Government, University and Industry Linkage / Collaboration Management |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This year based on that we summed up our previous studies and checked crosscutting issues, we made clear points which are important issues in regenerating local economy. Furthermore, we tried to brush up them through the International Conference held in Naha City, Okinawa Prefecture.
Those important results we have so far worked out in last three years are :
1) To carry out resurgent local economies by way of the industry clustering approach that could transfer industry conglomeration to industry cluster ; 2) To come up with the new type of measurement by which those who are in charge of the economic development can select competitive industry cluster in the local level ; 3) To analyze and sum up components of industry clustering in line with the collaboration management by local initiatives.
As a result that we checked those results together with opposite opinions in the International Conference in Okinawa, we reached that both of them would be available but our results must be more important. This is because ours are the approach by which local initiatives would be able to bottom them up, whilst other's are one that promote just a few of companies.
|
