2003 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
Between Habitation and Journey : Interaction Analysis of Attachment and Motives in Migration and Residential Preference
| Project/Area Number |
13610254
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
社会学(含社会福祉関係)
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Konan University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
SUGA Yasuhiro Konan University, Faculty of Letters, professor, 文学部, 教授 (40226410)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2001 – 2003
|
| Keywords | 'I' turn / migration / ex-urban / stranger / iourney / tourism / residential preference / attachment |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This research is a thing in order to build the new framework for considering the attachment to the area accompanying place-of-residence selection for the phenomenon of urban-rural migration to the main subject matters. It is the statement of the household which asked for new residential preference in a peripheral area called Hokkaido and Okinawa, the feelings uttered in the popular song, and CM, a magazine report, etc. are set as the object of main analysis.
As a conclusion, it is being begun in today's local selection to carryout the interpenetration of <habitation> and the <trip>. However, it is also a fact that many confusion is still looked at by the look which catches <habitation> with which the element of such every day life and non-every day life was mixed. Although many towns and villages about which it worries depopulated have set forth a migration promotion policy as a way stage of local activation after the 80s. An inconsistency is plentifully looked at by how to show the distance with remarkable an actual migrant's <habitation> consciousness and it of the area concerned in many cases, and catch the attachment to an area. That is, by the way, the qualitative difference <habitation> including <trip>, serious <habitation>, "attachment to the born land", and "attachment to the selected land" serves as a remote cause of the conflict of a stranger and a native in many cases. If it pulls, it can elaborate on it on the problem of the everyday formed to the ground level which eliminated the gap of recognition with the host society and guest society to <trip> and sightseeing, and the un-everyday statement.
However, there are many strangers which carried out local selection actively today as a knot point of a such dual confrontation They are concerned with the area in various forms, and have created local culture. That is, they are the children of the mobilization society in an original meaning, and have become the subject of new cultural creation.
|
