2004 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
A study of types and cognitive functions of representation from an interactionist perspective
| Project/Area Number |
14510004
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Philosophy
|
|---|
| Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
NOBUHARA Yukihiro The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Arts and Science, Associate Professor, 大学院・総合文化研究科, 助教授 (10180770)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2002 – 2004
|
| Keywords | interactionism / dynamical systems approach / symbolic representation / pictorial representation / distributed representation / nonconceptual representation / sense modality / Molyneux's problem |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
I have studied what roles representation plays in cognition from an interactionist perspective. The results are as follows. (1)Cognition is divided into two groups, one requiring representation and the other not. In the latter group there is an intimate interaction between an organism and its environment that is adequately described as a dynamical process, while the former group includes a process which is adequately described as transformations of representations or a convergence of stimuli into a certain inner state. (2)There are at least three types of representation ; symbolic representations which have syntactic structure and so are productive, pictorial representations which evoke a perception similar to the one evoked by the represented object, and distributed representations which represent composite things without decomposing. (3)The relatively low level of organism environment interaction such as perception or walking is enabled by distributed representations while the relati
… More
vely high level of interaction such as mediated by a plan or inference is enabled by symbolic representations. Pictorial representations enable a quasi perceptual experience of the represented object by evoking a perception similar to the one evoked by the object. (4)Thought includes symbolic representation while perception includes distributed one. Therefore thought has conceptual content which enables rational inference while perception has nonconceptual content which does not. As a consequence, perception cannot be a reason for having any thought. Nevertheless a perception can justify the thought which it causes in the sense that the thought is true when the perception is true. (5)Perceptions in different sense modalities such as vision, audition or touch employ different types of representation. Therefore the answer to the Molyneux's question is negative. However representations in different sense modalities which represent the same things have a tendency to be accommodated into the same concept. This tendency ensures that the uniqueness of the objective world is conceptually secured. Less
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[Book] 意識の哲学2002
Author(s)
信原 幸弘
Total Pages
230
Publisher
岩波書店
Description
「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
-
