| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
ANEZAKI Yoichi HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, GRADUATE SCHOOL EDUCATION, PROFESSOR (80128636)
MITSUMOTO Sigeru HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, GRADUATE SCHOOL EDUCATION, INSTRUCTOR (10333585)
YAMAGUCHI Kazutaka SAITAMA UNIVERSITY, EDUCATION, PROFESSOR (90182427)
KURAHARA Kiyohito KOUGAKUIN UNIVERSITY, ENGINEERING, PROFESSOR (50178092)
UEDA Takeo NAGOYA UNIVERSITY, GRADUATE SCHOOL, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT SCIENCES, Professor (10168627)
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Recently, the neo-liberal higher educational reform has been global trend. The neo-liberalism sifts from the stage to introduce market mechanism to the stage bearing new means of control by the state power through the mechanism. The higher educational reform is the same. But conditions are different from, the region or the nation. We used following way for analysis of this subject. Firstly, as the analysis framework, it is (1) the legal status of the university, (2) the administration and management, (3) the organization of research and teaching,(4) the university evaluation system, (5) the faculties' status, and (6) the problem of finances. Secondly, as the research target, it is America, England, New Zealand, Japan , Indonesia, China, Korea, and Vietnam. And then, we examined what is the condition of Japanese reform (especially laying down national and public university corporation) among those countries.
As a result, it is clarified the moving to the national and public university corporation in Japan is seen unique and remarkable. In comparison with America, England, and New Zealand which are advanced neo-liberalistic reform, and Asian region(Indonesia, China, Korea, and Vietnam)which maybe aim to follow theirs.
Firstly, sift to the Japanese national university corporation was carried out all at once and uniformly. It is unusual example Secondly, the government's direct control of Japanese universities is greatly intensifying. It systematically participate with the decision making of the university goal and plan, the assessment of their accomplishments, and the distribution of the university budget. Thirdly, the internal governance of the university shifted the management of the private enterprise type. Thereby, the authority of the university and the "academic freedom" has been reduced and deprived.
|
