2006 Fiscal Year Final Research Report Summary
International comparison of Policy Evaluation Systems
Project/Area Number |
17530116
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Politics
|
Research Institution | Waseda University |
Principal Investigator |
FUKUDA Koji Faculty of Political Science and Economics, Professor, 政治経済学術院, 教授 (20165286)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
YAMAYA Kiyoshi Doshisya University Department.of Public Policy, Professor, 政策学部, 教授 (90230599)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2006
|
Keywords | Policy evaluation / NPM Reforms / Accountability / European Union / European Commission / International comparison |
Research Abstract |
Policy evaluation has already proved effective at eradicating bid rigging and political corruption and has helped to restore trust in the EU both among the Nation States' representative organs 'and the citizens themselves. Consequently the European Council's Laeken Declaration, 15 December 2001, stressed the need for the EU to create a Constitution as a way of achieving greater accountability and legitimacy. The policy evaluation element of NPM is considered to be another important method of enhancing democratization and efficiency in the policy-making processes of the EU. The specific objectives of these papers are as follows : Firstly, we looked at European governance reforms which have been introduced in the light of NPM thinking. Secondly, we examined the history of the concept of Policy Evaluation and consider its definitions with regard to NPM reforms in the European Union. Thirdly, we have considered what kind of role is expected of policy evaluations in the EU, and the repercussions for accountability lines and links. We will analyze and summarize the EU's experiences of administrative reforms with regard to NPM and address the broader issues concerned with accountability, agencies and public management.
|
Research Products
(14 results)