2011 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
Sociological Research on the Method of Social Research for the Evaluation of Developmental Projects
| Project/Area Number |
21330112
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Sociology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hokkaido University of Education |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
UTAGAWA Takuo 北海道教育大学, 教育学部, 教授 (30142764)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TATSUMI Kazuko 山口大学, エクステンションセンター, 准教授 (80379924)
HAMAMOTO Atsushi 名古屋市立大学, 大学院・人間文化研究科, 准教授 (80457928)
SUZUKI Motoi 国立民族学博物館, 先端人類科学研究部, 准教授 (40282438)
SATOU Hiroshi 日本貿易振興機構, 海外調査部, 上席主任調査研究員 (50403613)
SANO Mayuko 立教大学, 社会学部, 助教 (00585416)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
KUROKAWA Sumito 横浜国立大学, 大学院・環境情報研究院, 教授 (20594790)
RAMPISELA Dorothea Agnes インドネシア・ハッサヌディン大学, 准教授
KOINUMA Youko 日本大学, 商学部, 非常勤講師 (60362323)
SHIMADA Megumi NPO法人地球の友と歩む会, 理事
KATAYAMA Hiroki 龍谷大学
SAITO Fumihiko 龍谷大学, 国際文化学部, 教授 (10288657)
SATOU Yutaka 一橋大学, キャリア支援室, 特任講師 (40534988)
KIM Tae Eun Korea International Cooperation Agency, Evaluation Office, Assistance Manager
KIM So-young Korea International Cooperation Agency, Evaluation Office, Assistant Manager
TADA Tomoyuki 国際協力機構, インドネシア事務所, 次長
MULYO Sumedi Andorono Ministry of Ntional Development Plannning, Head of Sub Directorate for Regional Economic and Socila Analysis
NAKAJIMA Kousuke 国際協力機構, スラウェシ地域開発能力向上プロジェクト, 業務調整員
RUSNADI Padjung Ministry for Development of Disadvantaged Regions, Indonesia, Primary Commodity Development, Deputy Assistant
YULASWATI Vivi National Development Planning Agency, Indonesia, Poverty Program Poverty Program Development, Deputy Director
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2009 – 2011
|
| Keywords | 貧困削減 / プロジェクト評価 / 開発援助 / 社会学 / 社会調査法 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
In the poverty reduction projects, many types of social research have been conducted and used for evaluation. There are methods that are not in a standard social research methodology. They include participatory research, ethnographic research, and focus group discussion. The evaluation system of JICA is confined to the immediate result of the project. It fails to evaluate the far-reaching impact that the project might bring after the end of the project period. Besides, it was often difficult for the project team to to collect good data appropriate for evaluation. There was a case where evaluators made allowances for the project members and positively ratified the result of project activities. We need to develop and disseminate methods of evaluation research based firmly on the ethics of social research.
|
