2013 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
How Do the Lay Judges in Europe Evaluate their Jury Systems? : on Legitimacy of Citizen Participation in Judicial Procedure
| Project/Area Number |
22402010
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 海外学術 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Fundamental law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hokkaido University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
OZAKI Ichiro 北海道大学, 大学院法学研究科, 教授 (00233510)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TAKAHASHI Hiroshi 神戸大学, 大学院法学研究科, 教授 (40282587)
IKEDA Kimihiro 神戸大学, 大学院法学研究科, 准教授 (70302643)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
HAMANO Ryo 立教大学, 法学部, 教授 (80267385)
|
|---|
| Research Collaborator |
VANOVERBEKE Dimitri ルーヴェン・カトリック大学, 文学部, 教授
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2010-04-01 – 2014-03-31
|
| Keywords | ベルギー / 陪審制 / 参審制 / 裁判員 / 正統性 / ドイツ / フランス / 市民の司法参加 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
In Western Europe, especially Belgium, we find strong abolitionist attitudes and opinions toward jury system among professional judges, attorneys, and journalists. Lay judges, on the other hand, come to hold through their experiences in court positive views on citizen participation in judicial procedure.
The ostensible conflict is consistently comprehensible with a theoretical framework that consists of distinction about legitimacy of institution between (a) primordial legitimacy conferred unconsciously by society and (b) functional legitimacy which is to be often reflected and reviewed by some professions and specialists.
|
