| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
|
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
It is important for treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease to evaluate cerebral blood flow. IMP-SPECT and PET are golden standard for evaluation of cerebral blood flow today. On the other hand, the challenge for the quantitative evaluation of cerebral blood flow by the ASL was performed. We thought that how correct was the quantitative evaluation by the ASL compared with PET.This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of ASL technique for quantitative evaluation of CBF in comparison with PET. 14 patients who were performed carotid endarterectomy (CEA) at our hospital from February 2015 to April 2017. We set these inclusion or exclusion criteria and chose 5 patients. Although PCASL slightly overestimated regional CBF values, there was significant correlation between the quantitative CBF values obtained using ASL and PET in all ROI plots.
|
