| Project/Area Number |
17K02275
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Aesthetics and studies on art
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Gunma University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2017-04-01 – 2020-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,250,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥750,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 書論 / 唐様書論 / 和様書論 / 書道史 / 芸術学 / 書学 / 芸術諸学 / 日本書論史 / 日本書道史 / 日本美術史 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This study tries to construct “A History of Japanese Calligraphic Theories.” When observed from the perspective of the history of calligraphic theories, calligraphic theories in Japan have three distinctive periods: “the origin of calligraphic theories” in the early Heian period, “establishment of the Jubokudo theory” from the late Heian to the Nanbokucho period, and “a prosperity of the Karayo theory” in the Edo period.
Three themes are identified:1. Systematization of the calligraphic theories in the Mid-Ancient / Middle ages mainly based on the ones by the Sesonji family，2. Relevance between the calligraphic theories in the Mid-Ancient / Middle ages and that in the Early-Modern age，3. Relationship between the theories of Wayo and Karayo in the Early-Modern age. This research also shows us what the Japanese sense of the beauty is and gives us an opportunity to construct a new view of “A History of Japanese Calligraphic Theories.”
|
| Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
本研究では、世尊寺家書論を中心とする中古・中世書論の体系化を行うことで、「日本書論」の特性とされてきた書式故実を述べた秘伝書としての性質がどのように形成されていったのかを明らかにした。また、藤原伊行の書論『夜鶴庭訓抄』の記述内容と伊行の自筆遺品「葦手下絵和漢朗詠集」の書写態度とを照らし、そこに関連性が見られることを指摘した。さらに、今日の書学領域では常識となっている「書聖・王羲之」は、書論の積み重なりによって形成されたものであると結論付けた。
本研究の成果が「日本書論史」構築の契機となったことの意義は大きい。
|
