Project/Area Number |
20330016
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Civil law
|
Research Institution | Keio University |
Principal Investigator |
MIKI Kouichi Keio University, 法務研究科, 教授 (20199970)
|
Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
UEHARA Toshio 明治大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (30114937)
HASEBE Yukiko 学習院大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (40159637)
OMURA Masahiko 中央大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (90129958)
TAKADA Masahiro 大阪市立大学, 法学(政治学)研究科(研究院), 教授 (50171450)
YAMAMOTO Kazuhiko 一橋大学, 法学(政治学)研究科(研究院), 教授 (40174784)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2008 – 2010
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2010)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥18,720,000 (Direct Cost: ¥14,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥4,320,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥4,420,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,020,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥7,280,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,680,000)
Fiscal Year 2008: ¥7,020,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,620,000)
|
Keywords | クラスアクション / 団体訴訟 / 集合的権利保護訴訟 / 消費者団体訴訟 / 集団訴訟 / 消費者庁 / 現地調査 / 集団訴訟制度 / 集合的権利保訴訟 / 拡散的権利 |
Research Abstract |
Collective redress actions for the purpose of consumer protection that have already come into force as national legislation in North American, South American and European countries can be categorized in 4 types, namely, opt-in type, opt-out type, combined type and two-step type. In accordance with our analysis, each type has advantages and disadvantages and each type has different consistency with Japanese legal system in existence. Therefore, the legislative design in Japan must consider these factors.
|