The Functions of Description and Interpretation in Lesson Analysis: An Experimental Study on its Validity for Pedagogical Factors
| Project/Area Number |
21330175
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Educaion
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Tokai Gakuen University (2013)
Nagoya University (2009-2012) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
MATOBA Masami 東海学園大学, 教育学部, 教授 (40142286)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
MATSUSHITA Haruhiko 名古屋大学, 教育発達科学研究科, 教授 (10199789)
SIBATA Yoshiaki 名古屋大学, 教育発達科学研究科, 准教授 (70293272)
SUGIMOTO Noriko 茨城大学, 教育学部, 准教授 (70344827)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
SARKAR ARANI Mohamamd Reza 帝京大学, 教育学部, 准教授 (30535696)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2009-04-01 – 2014-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2013)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥14,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥11,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥3,450,000)
Fiscal Year 2013: ¥3,380,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥780,000)
Fiscal Year 2012: ¥2,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥600,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥3,250,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥750,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥3,250,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥750,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥2,470,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥570,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 授業分析 / 授業研究 / 記述言語 / 中間項 / 解釈 / 分析単位 / 解釈の明示性 / 概念化 / 教育学 / 解釈学 / 逐語記録 / 授業諸要因 / 教育方法 / 認知理論 / 活動理論 / 問題解決 / 思考様式 / 発話 / 明示性 / 記述記号 / 再構成 / ドイツ教授学 / 授業記録 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
This study is designed to clarify the validity of existed description and interpretation methods from pedagogical perspective as well as develop an alternative tools. The main research points that clarified through this study are as follows:1) Relationship between description way and how using symbols/codes (signs) and thinking way of students, 2) Reversibility of the description using signs for remarking of students learning activities, 3) Description methods of action during teaching learning process, 4) Clarifying functions of units, and 5) Expression of the interpretation with the description form.
From this study it can be concluded that it is possible 1) to arrange students remarks with 46 signs and develop to express the diverse relation of particular expression to a general idea referred to as intermediate factors, 2) to divide units for analysis based on their meaning, and 3) to express the way of interpretation in description form using signs.
|
Report
(6 results)
Research Products
(79 results)
-
-
-
-
[Journal Article] 子どもの発言に内在する授業諸要因の抽出に関する事例研究2012
Author(s)
的場正美, 柴田好章, 水野正朗, 中嶋淑子,堀田 貴之, 近藤茂明, 福村美希, 新谷 裕,須田 昂宏, 埜崎志保, 丹下悠史, 付 洪雪,伊倉剛
-
Journal Title
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要
Volume: 第59巻第1号
Pages: 121-149
NAID
Related Report
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[Presentation] Lesson Analysis : Purpose, Process and Product2010
Author(s)
Masami Matoba
Organizer
the Lesson Study Symposium with 3rd APS Global Education Conference 2010, organized by Academy of Principals, Singapore
Place of Presentation
the Suntec Singapore International Convention & Exhibition Centre (Singapore) 招待講演
Year and Date
2010-06-04
Related Report
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
