A comparative study of the Jaina logic and Buddhist logic : Akalanka's way of differentiating his position from the Buddhist
Project/Area Number |
21720017
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Research Field |
Indian philosophy/Buddhist studies
|
Research Institution | Kyoto Sangyo University |
Principal Investigator |
SHIGA Kiyokuni 京都産業大学, 文化学部, 准教授 (60440872)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2009 – 2011
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2011)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,510,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥810,000)
Fiscal Year 2011: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2010: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2009: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
Keywords | インド / ジャイナ教 / 仏教 / 論理学 / アカランカ / 刹那滅論証 / 多面性論証 / ジャイナ教論理学 / 仏教論理学 / ダルマキールティ / ドゥルヴェーカミシュラ / ジャイナ論理学 |
Research Abstract |
It was observed through this research that Akalanka differentiates his position from the Buddhist view especially in the arguments on the proof of momentariness. The Jaina logicians, including Akalanka, criticize the logical reason "existence", which the Buddhist use in the proof of momentariness, as being the reason that leads to the opposite consequence to the proper one, whereas the Jaina logicians prove "manifoldness" or "alteration", which is a form of the Jaina's worldview, by means of the same reason "existence". For the Jaina logicians, the proof of momentariness and that of manifoldness are two sides of the same coin.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(14 results)