2013 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
Empirical study of psychotherapy according to Psychological process Q-set: applying to the training of counseling in a graduate school.
| Project/Area Number |
23530923
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Clinical psychology
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Chuo University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KASAI Makiko 鳴門教育大学, 大学院学校教育研究科, 教授 (70294733)
ITO Tomoko (SUZUKI Tomoko) 横浜国立大学, 教育人間科学部, 准教授 (60422581)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
MORI Hiroko 文教大学, 人間科学部, 教授 (20348428)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2011 – 2013
|
| Keywords | 心理面接過程 / 大学院教育 / 試行カウンセリング / 精神療法過程Qセット |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Differences of good and bad sessions of "trial counseling" practiced by students of graduate school of clinical psychology were investigated according to 100 items of Psychological process Q-set(PQS).
There were no significant relations between total grades of "trial counseling" and PQS assessments. Several items of PQS assessing the transcripts of the third session of "trail counseling" were related to good grades of the third session. Active interventions of the therapist such as structuring, giving guidance and advises, giving tasks outside of the session, and giving support were related to bad grades. Self-disclosure of the therapists do not contributed good grades, too.
It is important task in the training of counselings that such techniques are accommodated to the neutrality of the therapists.
|
Research Products
(3 results)
