2016 Fiscal Year Final Research Report
Interaction analysis of communication in Lay-Judge deliberations: how lay judges think and argue
| Project/Area Number |
26380014
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Fundamental law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Tokai University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2014-04-01 – 2017-03-31
|
| Keywords | 法社会学 / エスノメソドロジー / 裁判員評議 / 会話分析 / 相互行為分析 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Our research produced the following 7 results: 1)Professional judges tend to be oriented towards controlling lay-judges' discourse; 2)interactions exist between law and commonsense reasoning; 3)asymmetrical relations exist between pro-judges and lay-judges, 4)systematic analysis of readiness and availability of lay-judges' expression of opinion can be examined by attending to the characteristics of turns-at-talk in the deliberation; 5)interactional features of deliberation conversation was identified; 6)the relationship between commonsense knowledge and reasoning, and legal consequences; 7)narrative construction by lay judges with use of commonsense knowledge was examined and specified.
|
| Free Research Field |
法社会学
|
