• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to project page

2015 Fiscal Year Final Research Report

Developing a method of educational evaluation focused on a systematic error using subquestions

Research Project

  • PDF
Project/Area Number 26750068
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Research Field Science education
Research InstitutionYamagata University

Principal Investigator

YASUDA JUNICHIRO  山形大学, 基盤教育院, 准教授 (00402446)

Research Collaborator TANIGUCHI Masa-aki  名城大学, 教職センター, 准教授
Mae Naohiro  関西大学, 理工学教育開発センター, 特任教授
Hull Mike  Wayne State College, Department of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Assistant Professor
Project Period (FY) 2014-04-01 – 2016-03-31
Keywords学習評価 / 概念調査 / 教育評価 / 力学概念 / 妥当性評価 / 系統誤差
Outline of Final Research Achievements

In this study, we quantified the validity of FCI as a systematic error and analyzed its behavior. We focused on the false positives and used subquestions to judge whether a student understands the concept tested in an FCI question. The questions for which we created the subquestions are limited to the three invalid-like questions that, according to prior research, elicit false positives from students, and one of the remaining 27 valid-like questions. We used the results of the valid-like question and its subquestions to estimate the systematic error arising from the remaining 26 valid-like questions. Our results indicate that true score can be lower than half of raw score and true average normalized gain can be as low as half of raw average normalized gain, depending on the fitting function for the estimation. We also found that there are thresholds in the relationship between true positive ratio and raw score for the invalid-like questions, but not for the valid-like question.

Free Research Field

物理教育研究

URL: 

Published: 2017-05-10  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi